Pentagon directs military to pull library books that address diversity, anti-racism, gender issuesNew Foto - Pentagon directs military to pull library books that address diversity, anti-racism, gender issues

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon has ordered all military leaders and commands to pull and review all of their library books that address diversity, anti-racism or gender issues by May 21, according to a memo issued to the force on Friday. It is the broadest and most detailed directive so far on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's campaign torid the militaryof diversity and equity programs, policies andinstructional materials. And it follows similar efforts to remove hundreds of books from thelibraries at the military academies. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the memo, which was signed Friday by Timothy Dill, who is performing the duties of the defense undersecretary for personnel. In addition, Hegseth put out a memo Friday ordering the military academies to make sure they are admitting students based solely on merit —- with "no consideration of race, ethnicity, or sex." He underlined the word "no," but added that the schools can consider "unique athletic talent," prior military service or those from a military prep school. He said the secretaries of the services must certify within 30 days that the admissions offices are adhering to those standards. And he said the academies must rank student candidates by their "merit-based scores" within each nomination category. Those categories include students whose parents are service members or were troops killed or injured in duty, as well as those nominated by the vice president, senators or members of Congress. The memo on the latest library purge says that educational materials at the libraries "promoting divisive concepts and gender ideology are incompatible with the Department's core mission." It says department leaders must "promptly identify" books that are not compatible with that mission and sequester them by May 21. By then, the memo says, additional guidance will be provided on how to cull that initial list and determine what should be removed and "determine an appropriate ultimate disposition" for those materials. It does not say what will happen to the books or whether they will be stored away or destroyed. According to the memo, a temporary Academic Libraries Committee set up by the department will provide information on the review and decisions about the books. That panel provided a list of search terms to use in the initial identification of the books to be pulled and reviewed. The search terms include: affirmative action, anti-racism, critical race theory, discrimination, diversity, gender dysphoria, gender identity and transition, transgender, transsexual and white privilege. Early last month the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland,removed nearly 400 booksfrom its library after being told by Hegseth's office to get rid of those that promote DEI. About two weeks later, the Army and Air Force libraries were told to go through their stacks to findbooks related to diversity, equity and inclusion. The Naval Academy's purge led to the removal of books on the Holocaust, histories of feminism, civil rights and racism, and Maya Angelou's famous autobiography, "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings," based onthe list of 381 booksthat have been taken out of its library. In addition to Angelou's award-winning book, the list includes "Memorializing the Holocaust," which deals with Holocaust memorials; "Half American," about African Americans in World War II; "A Respectable Woman," about the public roles of African American women in 19th century New York; and "Pursuing Trayvon Martin," about the 2012 shooting of the Black 17-year-old boy in Florida that raised questions about racial profiling.

Pentagon directs military to pull library books that address diversity, anti-racism, gender issues

Pentagon directs military to pull library books that address diversity, anti-racism, gender issues WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon has ordere...
Democrats fume over Biden's return to spotlightNew Foto - Democrats fume over Biden's return to spotlight

Democrats are blasting former President Biden's reemergence in the spotlight following his interview Thursday on "The View," his second major postpresidency interview. During the sit-down, which took place alongside former first lady Jill Biden, Biden slammed President Trump's second administration, saying he's had "the worst 100 days any president's ever had." The former president also denied reports of his mental decline during his term and took responsibility for Democratic losses in 2024, telling the show's hosts, "I was in charge, and he won." Yet some Democrats are criticizing Biden's recent appearances, arguing the former president is becoming a drag on the party as it seeks to rebuild following its widespread losses in 2024. "Elections are about the future. Every time Joe Biden emerges, we fight an old war," said Democratic strategist Anthony Coley, who worked for the Biden administration. "Every interview he does provides a contrast to Trump that's just not helpful for the Democratic brand, which needs trusted messengers and fighters who can reach independents and moderates and inspire the base. Joe Biden ain't that." Coley said it was "good" Biden took responsibility for the events that led to Trump's election but questioned whether it mattered going forward. "Honestly, what good does that do now? Many Democrats — from elected leaders to the party faithful — are just ready to turn the page. I just don't think he understands how wide and deep this sentiment is," he said. Other Democratic critics argue the former president did not go far enough. One Democratic strategist said Biden needs to "take responsibility for his actions" and "own up to the fact that he caused Democrats to lose." "I don't think there's a willingness to cop to the fact that he should never have run again in the first place," the strategist said. "Why can't he come out and acknowledge that part of this is on him?" Thursday's interview with "The View" was his second sit-down interview of the week, with the first airing Tuesday on the BBC. Biden took multiple opportunities to criticize Trump's foreign policy in his conversation with the British broadcaster, taking particular aim at Trump's handling of the Russia-Ukraine war. Some Democrats say Biden would be better suited avoiding sit-down interviews and instead focus on community outreach, much like former President Carter did. "There is a way for President Biden to build his postpresidency, but this isn't it," said Steve Schale, a longtime Biden ally who ran a pro-Biden super PAC in recent cycles. "I really wish he'd embrace the thing that's been his calling card for 50 years: his humanity." While Biden focuses on preserving his legacy, Schale said he would take an approach similar to what Carter took in the years following his presidency. "By the end of his life, we were reminded of the decent and humble nature of the man thanks to his acts, not his words," Schale said. "I really wish Biden would follow a similar path." "Get out and work in the community. Do … things that highlight the things his administration did to help people," Schale said. "Let the images of his human interactions and the stories they tell rebuild the brand. That's way more powerful than playing pundit." The interviews come amid a slew of books detailing the last year of the Biden administration, including accusations his mental acuity was slipping while in office. Biden denied those reports, calling them "wrong." The former first lady also slammed reporting on Biden's mental acuity while in office, noting "the people who wrote those books were not in the White House with us." A second Democratic strategist predicted the Biden narrative on his mental acuity will not go away and will be something future presidential contenders will have to answer for. "There's a good chance that the most significant litmus test for any Democrat in the 2028 field will be how and if they admonish Biden for the political judgment in the final 18 months of his political career," the strategist said. But Biden still has staunch defenders within the Democratic ranks who argue his storied career in politics is needed in the party. "I thought that was good for Joe Biden to just be honest and open about where things were, and where they are, and where he thinks they very well could be based on his own life experiences," said Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright, who has spent time with Biden after his administration. "If you know Joe Biden like I know Joe Biden and have spent time with him post-the presidency like I've spent time with him, then you will know that Joe Biden is doing what is still in the best interests of the country," he continued. "Joe Biden can still be helpful to the country, to the Congress, the Constitution, and the community." Seawright said the choice of "The View" for Biden's first American postpresidency interview was good, given the program's broad reach. "I think 'The View' is a very captive audience. It's also a very diverse audience that crosses many sectors of the country," he said. But as younger voices become more prominent voices in the party, other Democrats are questioning why the interview was even necessary. "I don't know who's asking for this," Democratic strategist Jon Reinish said. "I actually think that a lot of people are starting to pay much more attention to a younger generation of Democrats free of baggage and who are finally starting to move the party away from folks who stayed too long at the fair." Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

Democrats fume over Biden’s return to spotlight

Democrats fume over Biden's return to spotlight Democrats are blasting former President Biden's reemergence in the spotlight followi...
Pope Leo XIV's voting history sparks speculation on political affiliationNew Foto - Pope Leo XIV's voting history sparks speculation on political affiliation

Thefirst American pope in historyvoted in several U.S. elections out of his home state of Illinois, according to records obtained by USA TODAY on Friday, including an absentee ballot cast in last year's hotly contested presidential election. Pope Leo XIV, a Chicago native, has cast ballots in seven separate elections since 2012, including three Republican primaries while living inWill County, a suburb just southwest of the Windy City. He did not vote in the 2020 presidential election or in the 2022 midterm elections. Many are already speculating on the new pontiff's political allegiances after taking the mantle as the spiritual leader of the world's 1.4 billion Roman Catholics on Thursday to global fanfare. Before being elected pope, for example, Leo XIV reposted a message on X, formerly known as Twitter, criticizing PresidentDonald Trumpand El Salvador President Nayib Bukele during their Oval Office meeting amid debate about awrongfully deported man. In February, he postedtwo opinion columnscritical of Vice PresidentJD Vance, a practicing Catholic, and the administration's stance on immigration. Many have latched onto the voting records as a sign of the new pontiff's politics, but Illinois officials are quick to point out that Prairie State voters are not required to register as members of a political party. "In Illinois, a declaration of party affiliation is not part of the voter registration process," Matt Dietrich, spokesman for the Illinois State Board of Elections said in a statement. The clerk's office for Cook County, Illinois, where the pontiff lived previously, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This story will be updated. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Pope Leo XIV's voting history sparks speculation

Pope Leo XIV's voting history sparks speculation on political affiliation

Pope Leo XIV's voting history sparks speculation on political affiliation Thefirst American pope in historyvoted in several U.S. electio...
US to accept white South African refugees while other programs remain pausedNew Foto - US to accept white South African refugees while other programs remain paused

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration will welcome more than two dozen white South Africans to the United States as refugees next week, an unusual move because it hassuspended most refugee resettlement operations, officials and documents said Friday. The first Afrikaner refugees are arriving Monday at Dulles International Airport outside Washington, according to a document obtained by The Associated Press. They are expected to be greeted by a government delegation, including the deputy secretary of state and officials from the Department of Health and Human Services, whose refugee office has organized their resettlement. The flight will be the first of several in a "much larger-scale relocation effort," White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told reporters. The Trump administration has taken a number of steps against South Africa,accusing the Black-led governmentof pursuing anti-white policies at home and an anti-American foreign policy. The South African governmentdenies the allegationsand says the U.S. criticism is full of misinformation. While State Department refugee programs have been suspended — halting arrivals from Afghanistan, Iraq, most of sub-Saharan Africa and other countries in amove being challenged in court— President Donald Trump issued an executive order in Februaryprioritizing the processing of white South Africansclaiming racial discrimination. "What's happening in South Africa fits the textbook definition of why the refugee program was created," Miller said. "This is persecution based on a protected characteristic — in this case, race. This is race-based persecution." Efforts to get white South Africans to the US Since Trump's executive order, the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria has been conducting interviews, "prioritizing consideration for U.S. refugee resettlement of Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination," the State Department said. The department said nothing about the imminent arrival of what officials said are believed to be more than two dozen white South Africans from roughly four families who applied for resettlement in the U.S. Their arrival had originally been scheduled for early last week but was delayed for reasons that were not immediately clear. The HHS Office for Refugee Resettlement was ready to offer them support, including with housing, furniture and other household items, and expenses like groceries, clothing, diapers and more, the document says. "This effort is a stated priority of the Administration." HHS didn't respond to messages seeking comment. Supporters of the refugee program questioned why the Trump administration was moving so quickly to resettle white South Africans while halting the wider refugee program, which brings people to the U.S. who are displaced by war, natural disaster or persecution and involves significant vetting in a process that often takes years. "We are concerned that the U.S. Government has chosen to fast-track the admission of Afrikaners, while actively fighting court orders to provide life-saving resettlement to other refugee populations who are in desperate need," Church World Services president Rick Santos said in a statement. His group has been assisting refugees for more than 70 years. Letting in white South Africans whilekeeping out Afghansis "hypocrisy," said Shawn VanDiver, who heads #AfghanEvac, which helps resettle Afghans who assisted the U.S. during the two-decade war. "Afghans who served alongside U.S. forces, who taught girls, who fought for democracy, and who now face Taliban reprisals, meet every definition of a refugee," he said. "Afghans risked their lives for us. That should matter," he said. Trump administration has accused South Africa of anti-white policies The Trump administration alleges the South African government has allowed minority white Afrikaner farmers to be persecuted and attacked, whileintroducing an expropriation lawdesigned to take away their land. The South African government has said it was surprised by claims of discrimination against Afrikaners because white people still generally have a much higher standard of living than Black people more than 30 years after the end of the apartheid system of white minority rule. South Africa is the homeland of close Trump adviser Elon Musk, who has been outspoken in his criticism, and it also holds the rotating presidency of the Group of 20 developed and developing nations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio notably boycotted a G20 foreign ministers meeting in Johannesburg in March because its agenda centered on diversity, inclusion and climate change. He alsoexpelled South Africa's ambassador to the U.S.in March for comments that the Trump administration interpreted as accusing the president of promoting white supremacy. Shortly thereafter, the State Department ended all engagement with the G20 during South Africa's presidency. The U.S. is due to host G20 meetings in 2026. What South Africa says about the refugees South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's office said in a statement Friday that he had spoken with Trump late last month on issues including U.S. criticism of the country and allegations that Afrikaners are being persecuted. Ramaphosa told Trump that the information the U.S. president had received "was completely false." "Therefore, our position is that there are no South African citizens that can be classified as refugees to any part of the world, including the U.S.," the statement said. The South African foreign ministry said Deputy Foreign Minister Alvin Botes spoke with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau on Friday about the refugees. Landau is expected to lead the delegation to welcome the group Monday. South Africa "expressed concerns" and denied allegations of discrimination against Afrikaners, the foreign ministry said in a statement. "It is most regrettable that it appears that the resettlement of South Africans to the United States under the guise of being 'refugees' is entirely politically motivated and designed to question South Africa's constitutional democracy," the statement said. It noted that the country has worked to prevent any repeat of the type of persecution and discrimination that happened under apartheid rule. The foreign ministry said it would not block anyone who wanted to leave as it respected their freedom of movement and choice. But it said it was seeking information about the "status" of the people leaving South Africa, wanting assurances that they had been properly vetted and did not have outstanding criminal cases. The foreign ministry added that South Africa was "dedicated to constructive dialogue" with the U.S. ___ Gumede reported from Johannesburg. Associated Press writers Gerald Imray in Cape Town, South Africa, Gisela Salomon in Miami, and Seung Min Kim and Amanda Seitz in Washington contributed to this report.

US to accept white South African refugees while other programs remain paused

US to accept white South African refugees while other programs remain paused WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration will welcome more th...
White House reveals why Trump fired Librarian of Congress as Democrats call her ouster a 'disgrace'New Foto - White House reveals why Trump fired Librarian of Congress as Democrats call her ouster a 'disgrace'

TheWhite Houseis defending PresidentDonald Trump's decision to sack the first woman and first non-white person to serve asLibrarianofCongressby stating that oustedlibrarianCarla Hayden"did not fit the needs of the American people." Hayden, who was confirmed to serve a 10-year term in 2016 and had one year left in the job, was also the first professional librarian to lead the library since the 1970s. She was informed of her termination by way of an email from theWhite HouseOffice of Presidential Personnel, the little-known arm of the White House that has been carrying out a purge of federal officials who served under or were appointed by Trump's predecessor, former president Joe Biden. The email said her service was "terminated effective immediately." Hayden had been the subject of criticism from a group called the American Accountability Foundation that has targeted civil servants and other government officials who they have deemed "woke" or insufficiently loyal to Trump's agenda. The group accused her of being "anti-Trump" and of having promoted "trans-ing kids" in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday, just before she was terminated from her position. Asked why Trump had moved to fire Hayden, press secretaryKaroline Leavittsaid the her continued service "did not fit the needs of the American people" and accused her of having done "quite concerning things ... in the pursuit of [Diversity, Equity and Inclusion]," as well as having put "inappropriate books for children" in the library, which receives copies of every book that is copyrighted in the United States each year. "We don't believe that she was serving the interests of the American taxpayer well, so she has been removed from her position, and the President is well within his rights to do that," Leavitt said. Democrats inCongresshave condemned Trump's decision as part of an assault on free expression. Rosa DeLauro, the Connecticut congresswoman who serves as the top Democrat on the powerful House Appropriations Committee, said in a statement that Hayden had been "loved" and "respected" by members of both parties. "A 'fighter of freedom' and a guardian of our nation's truth and intellectual legacy, Dr. Hayden was just abruptly and callously fired by President Trump. "Dr. Hayden's tenure has been marked by a steadfast commitment to accessibility, modernization, and the democratization of knowledge. Her dismissal is not just an affront to her historic service but a direct attack on the independence of one of our most revered institutions," she said. Representative Joe Morelle of New York, the ranking member of the House Administration Committee, called Hayden "an American hero" and said in a statement that he would introduce legislation to "guarantee that the Librarian of Congress is appointed by Congress" going forward. He also called Trump's move "ignorant" and warned that it would "impact America's libraries, our copyrighted economic interests, and service to the American people." Another New Yorker, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, called her firing "a disgrace" and "the latest in his ongoing effort to ban books, whitewash American history and turn back the clock."

White House reveals why Trump fired Librarian of Congress as Democrats call her ouster a ‘disgrace’

White House reveals why Trump fired Librarian of Congress as Democrats call her ouster a 'disgrace' TheWhite Houseis defending Presi...

 

VS JORNAL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com